cyber security

PATECCO’s Tips for Preventing Phishing Attacks

Uncategorized / Von

When it comes to cyber threats, phishing remains one of the most widespread and effective attack methods used by cybercriminals. It’s no longer just about spam emails asking for bank details – phishing has become highly sophisticated, often disguised as internal communication, trusted services, or urgent alerts. Whether you are an individual or an enterprise, one careless click on a malicious link can lead to data breaches, credential theft, financial fraud, or ransomware infections. According to industry reports, over 90% of cyberattacks start with a phishing email. But the good news is: phishing is preventable. With the right knowledge, tools, and mindset, you can significantly reduce your risk exposure. PATECCO gives seven practical tips to help you recognize phishing attempts, protect your data, and foster a cyber-aware culture within your organization. 1. Think before you click Phishing emails are designed to create urgency or curiosity – “Your account will be locked!”, “Check this invoice!”, or “Click here to claim your prize!”. Attackers rely on emotional triggers to get you to click without thinking. Stay alert by: 2. Enable Multi-Factor Authentication (MFA) Even the most cautious users may occasionally be tricked. That’s where MFA acts as a powerful safety net. It requires a second form of verification beyond just a password — such as a code sent to your phone, an app-based prompt, or a biometric scan. Benefits of MFA: 3. Keep software up to date Phishing attacks often exploit known software vulnerabilities. If your operating system, email client, or browser is outdated, you may be leaving the door open to attackers. Best practices: 4. Train employees continuously Human error is the #1 vulnerability in cybersecurity. One uninformed employee can unknowingly compromise an entire network. Make security awareness part of your culture: 5. Use anti-phishing tools Technology can assist your defense. Many security solutions use AI and threat intelligence to detect phishing attempts before they reach end users. Key tools to consider: 6. Report suspicious Emails Creating a culture of reporting is just as important as detection. Promptly reporting phishing emails helps security teams act fast, prevent spread, and analyze threats. Encourage users to: 7. Have a response plan Despite all precautions, no system is 100% immune. Having an incident response plan ensures you can react quickly and minimize damage if a phishing attack succeeds. Include in your plan: Key Takeawas Phishing is no longer just a personal threat – it’s a strategic attack vector targeting organizations of all sizes. As attackers become more refined, defenders must become more resilient. By fostering a culture of cybersecurity vigilance, training your team regularly, and implementing layered security measures – from email filters to multi-factor authentication – you significantly reduce the risk of falling victim. Remember: it only takes one click to compromise your entire network, but it also only takes one moment of caution to stop an attack in its tracks. Stay alert, stay informed, and keep phishing threats at bay – a proactive approach today means fewer breaches tomorrow. Looking to assess your organization’s phishing risk or implement advanced protection? Let our IAM and cybersecurity experts help you design a stronger, smarter defense.

Five IAM Misconfigurations That Can Cost You Millions

Uncategorized / Von

As traditional perimeters fade, identity now defines the frontline of security – and it’s where many breaches begin. Misconfigurations in Identity and Access Management (IAM) remain one of the most common and costly vulnerabilities organizations face today. They’re not just technical oversights –  they are open doors waiting to be exploited. Here are five IAM misconfigurations we frequently encounter, why they’re dangerous, and how to proactively fix them before they lead to breaches, fines, or worse. 1. Orphaned Accounts The problem: Users leave the organization, but their accounts — and access — remain active. These forgotten identities can easily be hijacked by attackers, especially if they belong to former employees with elevated privileges. The fix: 2. Excessive Privileges The problem: Employees accumulate access over time — often due to role changes or temporary projects — but rarely lose it. Over time, this results in users having far more access than they need. The fix: 3. Overuse of Admin Rights The problem: When everyone is an admin, no one is secure. Overprivileged accounts increase your attack surface and the potential damage from account compromise. The fix: 4. No MFA on Critical Systems The problem: Despite being one of the simplest security measures, Multi-Factor Authentication (MFA) is still not consistently enforced across sensitive systems. This leaves critical access points — like VPNs or cloud admin consoles — vulnerable to credential theft. The fix: 5. Lack of Visibility and Logging The problem: If you don’t know who accessed what, when, or why — you can’t detect breaches, investigate incidents, or prove compliance. Flying blind is not a strategy. The fix: IAM isn’t just an IT concern – it’s a core pillar of enterprise security. These five misconfigurations are not theoretical risks – they’re real, recurring gaps that attackers are actively exploiting. Fortunately, they’re also preventable. By proactively addressing these weak points, you not only reduce your risk exposure but also strengthen your organization’s security posture, resilience, and trustworthiness. Whether you have questions about cybersecurity, need advice on IAM solutions, or want to explore a potential collaboration, feel free to reach out at info@patecco.com or call +49 (0) 23 23 – 9 87 97 96 .

How to Reduce Data Leakage and Data Breaches with RBAC?

Uncategorized / Von

With the growing amount of sensitive data being stored and accessed across various platforms, ensuring strong data protection has become a top priority for organizations of all sizes. One effective solution to mitigate these risks is Role-Based Access Control (RBAC). This security model enables organizations to limit access to data based on an individual’s role within the organization. In this article, we’ll highlight how RBAC can be used to reduce data leakage and data breaches by ensuring that access to sensitive information is strictly controlled, minimizing the risk of unauthorized access, and helping organizations maintain compliance with security standards. The risks of data leakage and data breaches Data leakage and data breaches pose significant risks to organizations, both financially and reputationally. Data leakage, whether accidental or unintentional, can expose sensitive information to unauthorized individuals, often resulting in compliance violations, legal consequences, and loss of trust. On the other hand, data breaches, which typically involve malicious actors gaining unauthorized access, can lead to the theft of valuable personal or corporate data, such as financial details or intellectual property. Both incidents can cause severe damage to a company’s reputation, erode customer confidence, and result in costly fines, especially when regulatory compliance requirements are not met. In an increasingly interconnected world, the risks associated with these breaches are more prominent, making it crucial for organizations to adopt robust data protection measures. Key principle of Role-Based Access Control (RBAC) The key principle behind RBAC is the principle of least privilege: users are only granted the minimum level of access required to perform their job functions. By assigning access permissions based on roles rather than individuals, RBAC ensures that users are given the minimum level of access required, reducing the risk of accidental or intentional misuse of sensitive data. This principle not only helps in enhancing security but also streamlines access management, ensuring that only authorized individuals can interact with critical information. How RBAC Reduces Data Leakage and Data Breaches As mentioned, data leakage and data breaches pose serious risks to organizations, but by implementing Role-Based Access Control (RBAC), businesses can significantly reduce their vulnerability. When combined with other security measures, such as multi-factor authentication and employee education, RBAC forms a comprehensive strategy to safeguard critical information and maintain compliance with regulations. RBAC is not a one-size-fits-all solution, but when implemented correctly, it is an essential part of a broader data security strategy. By taking the time to define roles, assign appropriate permissions, and continually monitor access, organizations can protect their data from leakage, breaches, and other security threats in the ever-evolving digital landscape. Interested in getting advice from PATECCO‘s expert? Book Your Free 30-Minute Consultation!

How to Navigate Risk Management Under the NIS-2 Directive

Uncategorized / Von

In a world where unexpected events and financial risks are omnipresent, effective management of risks is becoming a critical competency for organizations. The NIS 2 directive requires comprehensive analysis and specific controls to ensure the security and integrity of information and processes. By implementing appropriate risk management measures, companies can not only improve their security posture, but also minimize the impact of potential risks on their services and projects. In this article, we would like to explain the term risk management in the context of cyber security and illustrate why the establishment of effective risk management is essential in every company today, regardless of legal requirements. What is Risk Management? In IT environment, risk management is all about identifying and preparing for possible problems that could affect computer systems, data, or networks. It means figuring out what could go wrong, like a data breach, a cyberattack, or a system crash, and then planning ways to prevent these issues or reduce their impact. Potentially, every company or organization is exposed to the threat of a ransomware attack by criminal groups. The question now is, how is the risk composed? An external threat becomes a threat due to a vulnerability, such as an untrained employee opening an email with a malicious attachment, which causes the malware to be executed on the system. The combination of threat (for example, email with malicious content) and unprotected vulnerability (untrained employee) poses a risk to the protected object (client system). This in turn has a negative impact on the availability, confidentiality and integrity of the protected object or the information stored on it. The risk can be reduced by implementing targeted risk management measures that are appropriate to the threat situation. In the case of our example of an attack via a malicious email, this could be training measures to raise employee awareness. What Risk Management measures does the NIS-2 Directive require from companies? The NIS-2 Directive mandates that companies implement comprehensive risk management measures to safeguard their operations and data. A thorough risk analysis is fundamental, enabling businesses to identify potential threats and vulnerabilities inherent in their services. By establishing robust controls, organisations can mitigate risks associated with cyber incidents, which can have significant financial and operational impacts. Furthermore, the importance of managing information security cannot be overstated, it directly contributes to maintaining customer trust and ensuring business continuity. Companies are encouraged to adopt a proactive approach by regularly reviewing and updating their risk management processes. This involves assessing the impact of various risk events on health and safety, as well as on the overall stability of operations. Engaging in risk management topics through structured projects reinforces the organisation’s resilience against unforeseen challenges. Ultimately, these measures not only protect against immediate threats but also enhance the long-term sustainability of the business within the evolving digital landscape. Furthermore, organisations must foster a culture of risk awareness among employees, integrating risk management into everyday business practices. The directive emphasizes the importance of a systematic approach to managing risks, which includes continuous monitoring of events and updating safety protocols. By adhering to these measures, companies not only comply with regulatory expectations but also strengthen their ability to safeguard sensitive information, thereby protecting their reputation and securing their services against emerging threats in an increasingly digital landscape. The role of Incident Response in Risk Management Effective incident response is a vital component of risk management, particularly under the NIS-2 Directive. Companies are required to establish comprehensive processes that not only prepare them for potential risks but also facilitate swift, efficient reactions to unforeseen events. This entails a thorough analysis of possible risk scenarios, including those that could impact financial assets and the health of information systems. By implementing robust controls, organisations can mitigate the damage caused by incidents, safeguarding both data integrity and operational continuity. Regularly reviewing and updating incident response strategies ensures that they remain relevant in an ever-evolving threat landscape, allowing companies to navigate challenges with confidence. Ultimately, a well-crafted incident response plan not only addresses immediate risks but also strengthens long-term risk management capabilities, providing a comprehensive view of security as it pertains to services and project management. Compliance and reporting obligations under NIS-2 The NIS-2 Directive imposes specific compliance and reporting obligations on businesses, which are critical for effective risk management. Furthermore, organisations are required to implement appropriate controls to mitigate identified risks, thereby safeguarding their information systems and services. The management of these processes not only enhances their resilience against cyber threats but also ensures alignment with legal requirements. Regular updates and audits of their risk management strategies are essential to maintain compliance and address emerging risks effectively. Companies should be proactive in identifying vulnerabilities and documenting their responses, fostering a culture of transparency and accountability within their operations. This comprehensive approach guarantees that businesses are well-prepared to navigate the complexities of today’s digital landscape. Challenges in adopting Risk Management measures Adopting effective risk management measures as outlined by the NIS-2 Directive presents various challenges for businesses. One significant obstacle is the need for thorough risk analysis, which requires a deep understanding of potential threats to information and data security. Companies must implement robust controls to mitigate these risks, yet many struggle to allocate sufficient resources for this task. Additionally, the integration of risk management processes into existing projects can be complex, as it involves aligning operational practices with regulatory requirements. Financial impacts resulting from inadequate risk management can be substantial, further incentivising organisations to prioritise safety. However, the ever-evolving nature of cyber threats means that businesses must remain vigilant and adaptable in their approach. The necessity to track events and manage risks proactively can overwhelm teams already focused on daily operations. Ultimately, balancing compliance with practical implementation of risk management strategies remains a pressing challenge for companies striving for resilience in an increasingly digital landscape. Best practices for companies to enhance Risk Management Implementing effective risk management measures is vital for companies striving to comply with the NIS-2 Directive. It is imperative

Which functionalities of PAM help organizations meet NIS2 and DORA requirements?

Uncategorized / Von

In an era where cyber threats are increasingly sophisticated and frequent, robust regulatory frameworks are essential to ensure the security and resilience of critical infrastructures. The Network and Information Systems Directive 2 (NIS2) and the Digital Operational Resilience Act (DORA) are two pivotal regulations in the European Union aimed at bolstering cybersecurity and operational resilience across various sectors, particularly financial services. Central to achieving compliance with these regulations is the implementation of effective Privileged Access Management (PAM) solutions. PAM solutions are designed to secure, manage, and monitor privileged access, addressing some of the most critical security challenges organizations face today. By providing advanced functionalities such as secure credential storage, granular access controls, real-time monitoring, and comprehensive auditing, PAM solutions help organizations meet the stringent requirements set by NIS2 and DORA. This article delves into the specific functionalities of PAM that align with and fulfill the requirements of NIS2 and DORA, illustrating how these tools not only enhance security, but also ensure regulatory compliance, thereby contributing to a robust and resilient cybersecurity framework. The Network and Information Systems Directive 2 (NIS2) The Network and Information Systems Directive 2 (NIS2) is an updated and enhanced version of the original NIS Directive, which was the first comprehensive piece of EU-wide legislation, focused on improving cybersecurity across member states. The NIS2 Regulation represents a significant advancement in the EU’s approach to cybersecurity, aiming to build a more resilient and secure digital landscape across member states. NIS2 aims to address the evolving landscape of cyber threats by expanding the scope of its predecessor, introducing more stringent requirements, and ensuring a higher level of security and resilience for network and information systems within the European Union. The Digital Operational Resilience Act (DORA) The Digital Operational Resilience Act (DORA) is a comprehensive regulatory framework proposed by the European Commission to enhance the cybersecurity and operational resilience of the financial sector within the European Union. DORA aims to ensure that financial entities can withstand, respond to, and recover from ICT-related disruptions and threats effectively. Compliance with DORA requires financial entities to adopt proactive measures to identify, assess, and manage ICT risks effectively, ensuring they can continue to operate and safeguard financial stability in an increasingly digital economy. Specific PAM functionalities that align with the requirements of NIS2 and DORA 1. Secure Credential Storage and Management NIS2 and DORA mandate the protection of sensitive information and access credentials. PAM solutions provide secure storage for privileged credentials through encryption and secure vaulting mechanisms. This ensures that credentials are protected from unauthorized access, reducing the risk of credential theft and subsequent security breaches. Key functionalities include: encrypted vaulting of passwords and keys, automated password rotation to minimize exposure, secure access to credentials based on role and necessity 2. Granular Access Controls To comply with NIS2 and DORA, organizations must implement strict access control measures. PAM solutions offer granular access controls that enforce the principle of least privilege. This means users are granted only the access necessary for their roles, reducing the risk of unauthorized access to critical systems. The essential functionalities refer to: Role-based access control (RBAC) to define and enforce access policies, fine-grained access permissions tailored to specific tasks, approval workflows for elevated access requests. 3. Multi-Factor Authentication (MFA) MFA is essential for securing privileged access and is a requirement under NIS2 and DORA. PAM solutions integrate MFA to add an extra layer of security, ensuring that only authorized users can access privileged accounts. This reduces the risk of unauthorized access even if credentials are compromised. The core functionalities are as follows: Integration with various MFA methods (enforcement of MFA for all privileged access attempts, contextual MFA, adjusting the level of authentication required based on the risk associated with the access request). 4. Real-Time Monitoring and Auditing Continuous monitoring and auditing are critical for detecting and responding to security incidents, as required by NIS2 and DORA. PAM solutions provide real-time monitoring of all privileged activities and generate detailed audit logs. These logs help organizations detect suspicious behavior, respond to incidents promptly, and provide evidence for regulatory audits. Key functionalities include: Real-time session monitoring and recording, comprehensive audit trails of all privileged access and activities, alerts and notifications for anomalous or suspicious behavior. 5. Automated Privileged Session Management Effective session management is crucial for securing privileged access. PAM solutions offer automated session management to control and monitor privileged access sessions. This includes initiating, monitoring, and terminating sessions automatically, ensuring that all activities are tracked and secured. Important features comprise: automated session initiation and termination, session recording and playback for audit and forensic purposes and contextual session controls, such as limiting commands or actions based on policy. 6. Risk Assessment and Reporting NIS2 and DORA require organizations to continuously assess and manage risks associated with privileged access. PAM solutions include risk assessment tools that analyze the security posture of privileged accounts and identify potential vulnerabilities. These tools help organizations implement risk mitigation strategies and ensure ongoing compliance. Essential features encompass: Risk scoring and assessment for privileged accounts, automated reporting on compliance status and security posture, tools for continuous monitoring and risk assessment. 7. Incident Response and Forensics Rapid response and forensic analysis are crucial in the event of a security incident. PAM solutions facilitate quick incident response by providing detailed logs and real-time monitoring data that can be used to investigate and address security breaches. This capability helps organizations meet NIS2 and DORA requirements for incident response and recovery. Critical functionalities involve: detailed logging and forensic data collection, tools for quick analysis and response to security incidents, integration with incident response workflows and teams Why you should be NIS2 and DORA compliant? Adherence to the Network and Information Systems Directive 2 (NIS2) and the Digital Operational Resilience Act (DORA) is imperative for organizations seeking to fortify their cybersecurity defenses and ensure operational resilience in today’s digital landscape. By embracing NIS2 and DORA compliance, organizations not only fulfill legal obligations, but also proactively protect critical infrastructure, sensitive data, and customer trust. Compliance

PKI strategy as an essential foundation for a secure business environment

Uncategorized / Von

In today’s digital world, securing business environments against an ever-evolving landscape of cyber threats is more critical than ever. A robust Public Key Infrastructure (PKI) strategy stands as an essential foundation for achieving this security. PKI provides a framework for encrypting data, authenticating users, and ensuring the integrity of digital transactions, making it indispensable for businesses aiming to protect sensitive information and maintain trust with their stakeholders. As companies increasingly rely on digital interactions and remote operations, the strategic implementation of PKI not only fortifies their defenses, but also enhances overall operational resilience and compliance with regulatory standards. It is no wonder that business applications in the IoT sector are increasingly reliant on PKI technologies to ensure a high level of security. This article considers the importance of an effective PKI implementation and its pivotal role in creating a secure business environment. Function of the certification authorities (CAs) Certification Authorities (CAs) play a crucial role in the realm of digital security by acting as trusted entities that issue and manage digital certificates. These certificates serve as electronic credentials that verify the identities of individuals, organizations, and devices, facilitating secure communications and transactions over the internet. The primary functions of CAs include: Through these functions, Certification Authorities underpin the security of digital interactions, providing the assurance needed for safe and trustworthy exchanges of information online. Risks of inadequate PKI implementation The implementation of encryption requires both time and money. It requires the IT team to define which communications or traffic should be encrypted and what impact this will have on the systems and users that utilise them. For example, some organisations should also introduce encryption policies for IoT devices connected to their network. If a PKI strategy is not properly implemented or executed, not only can communication fail, but there are significant risks involved. For example, digital failures, which are generally errors in the network or connected devices, can result in messages not being forwarded. In this case, it is unlikely that data has been intercepted by hackers. However, an unsecured digital identity can also pose a more serious problem. This is the case when someone with an expired certificate impersonates someone else. Similarly, failed audits or compromised certificate authorities can lead to data leaks. To prevent this, it is crucial that a specific team is given responsibility for managing the PKI infrastructure, for example the IT security team or the network team. Possible consequences of improper management Proper PKI implementation and key management are essential for smooth and secure data transfer. Some of the consequences of an ineffective PKI implementation are outlined below: Increasing importance of PKIs In an era where digital interactions underpin nearly every facet of our personal and professional lives, the significance of Public Key Infrastructure (PKI) cannot be overstated. As cyber threats grow more sophisticated, the demand for robust security measures becomes paramount. PKI stands out as a critical component in safeguarding data integrity, authenticity, and confidentiality. Its ability to provide secure communications, authenticate users, and manage digital certificates makes it indispensable in various sectors, from finance and healthcare to government and e-commerce. Moreover, the rise of emerging technologies such as the Internet of Things (IoT), cloud computing, and blockchain further amplifies the necessity for reliable PKI solutions. These technologies, while offering immense benefits, also introduce new vulnerabilities that PKI is uniquely equipped to address. As organizations and individuals continue to navigate the complexities of the digital landscape, investing in and enhancing PKI capabilities will be essential in maintaining trust and security. In summary, PKI’s role in ensuring secure digital communications and transactions is becoming increasingly vital. As cyber threats evolve, so must our approach to cybersecurity. By embracing and advancing PKI, we can build a more secure digital future, where privacy and trust are foundational elements of our online interactions.

Why Identities are the heart of digitalization and cyber security?

Uncategorized / Von

Everyone is talking about digital transformation. It helps companies to improve the customer experience, simplify business processes and prepare for future challenges and business requirements. However, this modernization also poses new challenges in terms of cyber security and data protection. This is because the use of local and multi-cloud/remote environments means that users can access data from anywhere. Identity governance is therefore shifting with the use of identity federation and personal devices (BYOD). At the same time, the number of data access points, roles and user accounts is increasing – including privileged accounts. In such a complex IT ecosystem, it is difficult to manage and control identities and their access effectively. Attacks on identities are a daily routine It is well known that the top management level is directly responsible for its corporate risks and consequently their management. This also includes risks relating to Identity Governance & Administration (IGA), as they have a major impact both operationally and financially. Identifying and managing identity-related risks is fundamental, as the consequences of a security breach in connection with identities range from reputational damage to financial losses in the form of fines or ransomware payments. In order to create effective risk-based access and identity management programs, the focus is on the risks of each individual identity: These risks have been exacerbated by the global pandemic, but the theft of access data is also on the rise. In this regard, we recommend focusing on distributed, remote workplaces and employees as well as efficient monitoring of digital threats and the fulfilment and assessment of legal and industry-specific data protection and security requirements. It is also advisable to check access to sensitive customer and financial data as well as transactional processes. Identities take centre stage Today’s requirements are forcing companies to place identity and its context at the centre. For example, an identity can be both an employee and a customer, a doctor can be a patient or an employee can be a citizen. In combination with agile business models, job sharing, job rotation, etc., access management has evolved from a traditional perimeter-based to an identity-centric approach. We see time and time again that organisations struggle with the following four areas in particular: A holistic Identity Governance & Administration (IGA) that not only targets cloud, hybrid and/or on-premises security, but also the expectations of users and companies with regard to data protection, data security and cyber security can provide a remedy here. IGA solves open issues in IAM IGA is an important aspect of managing and controlling identities and the corresponding access authorisation. At the same time, IGA helps to solve IAM challenges such as inappropriate and/or outdated access to company resources, remote employees, time-consuming provisioning processes, weak Bring Your Own Device (BYOD) policies or strict compliance requirements. All of these issues increase the security risk and weaken the compliance position of companies. With IGA, companies can automate their access management workflows extensively – even beyond their own perimeter – and thus reduce risks. IAM guidelines can also be defined and implemented. Last but not least, this enables companies to actively review user access processes for compliance reporting and proactively initiate automated measures. For this reason, more and more companies are modernising to IGA in order to continue to meet the increasing compliance requirements of eHealth, SOX, ISO/IEC 27701, PCI DSS etc. in the long term. But it’s not just compliance that benefits from IGA! IGA improves the overview of what users can and cannot access. This enables IT administrators to optimise identity management and access control, efficiently mitigate risks and protect business-critical systems and data. With the right IGA tools, organisations can protect themselves in today’s complex IT and cyber security landscape, improve their resilience and achieve scalable growth. Business-to-identity as a key element IGA is the secret supreme discipline in the areas of governance, risks and compliance. Identity Governance & Administration with all its disciplines such as Privileged Access Management (PAM), Customer Identity & Access Management (CIAM) etc. are key functions for strategic security objectives such as: Zero Trust Completeness, Need-to-know, Security by Design, Security by Default. A central element in identity-centric management is to place identity at the centre of security strategies, based on a business-to-identity framework with IGA. Such a framework includes best practices for effective management of the identity-related threat landscape, overcoming hurdles in the context of automation and ensuring security by design in the centralised governance of identities. IGA tools also support the tracking and control of user access, both for local and cloud-based systems. This allows you to ensure that the right users have the right access to the right systems throughout the lifecycle, as well as detect and prevent unauthorised access. By implementing the right controls with Identity Governance and Administration, organizations can significantly enhance their security posture, ensure compliance with regulatory requirements, and streamline user access management to improve efficiency. IGA solutions provide a comprehensive framework to manage digital identities, define and enforce access policies, conduct access reviews, and generate audit-ready reports. This holistic approach not only reduces the risk of data breaches but also enables businesses to adapt rapidly to changing security landscapes and align IT processes with corporate governance objectives.

PATECCO Launches a New Whitepaper: „The Role of Adaptive Authentication and Recertification of Regular and Privileged Users.“

Uncategorized / Von

PATECCO latest whitepaper – „The Role of Adaptive Authentication and Recertification of Regular and Privileged Users“ – is a useful source of information providing insights of how adaptive authentication and recertification practices can fortify your defenses against cyber threats. We will explore the benefits of these approaches in mitigating security risks, enhancing user experience, and ensuring compliance with industry regulations. Additionally, we will describe One Identity adaptive authentication solutions, along with PATECCO best practices for implementing OI solutions to help organizations strengthen their IAM strategies and safeguard their critical assets in an increasingly digital world. Enjoy the whitepaper as we navigate the evolving landscape of identity and access management and empower your organization to stay ahead of emerging cyber threats. Download your copy now:

Measures to protect privileged accounts with Privileged Account Management

Uncategorized / Von

Cybercrime has become the most prevalent criminal activity worldwide. Companies must therefore protect their privileged accounts against this ever-growing threat. These are, for example, administrator, service, root or database accounts. Cyber criminals favour such accounts because they allow access to sensitive and business-critical resources. Privileged accounts require particularly effective management and security to protect them.  Privileged Access Management (PAM) is one of the ways to achieve this. That cyber security solution requires that the assets are first identified, before being protected. This article shows how PAM can effectively protect the privileged accounts against cyber threats. Where are the privileged accounts? Access rights apply to all parts of hybrid IT, from the local database administrator or application stewards to external partners, suppliers, application admins or developers, but also to helpdesks or computers and devices in the Internet of Things area. All these populations and privileged accounts are growing as IT expands towards new technologies such as cloud solutions or services managed by external partners How does PAM help my company? PAM makes it possible to manage all privileged accounts. All types of privileged accounts are recorded, categorised and automatically integrated into the system. This enables efficient management of privileged accounts and brings benefits within a very short time. PAM also helps with the management of privileged access rights by checking and monitoring the use of privileged access data. As a result, organisations achieve complete control and accountability over privileged access. PAM solutions enable the management of business secrets and access to sensitive data and privileged credentials used by applications, tools and other non-human identities without compromising the agility of DevOps workflows. Secure privileged account management is easy to implement with a well-planned security strategy. IT departments can protect their privileged accounts with the following five measures: 1. Identify and prioritise privileged accounts The basis of effective privileged account management is a complete overview of all existing privileged accounts in the company network. This may sound simple and manageable, but for many IT departments it is a major challenge. This is because these accounts are distributed throughout the company’s IT and it is not uncommon for their number to far exceed the number of employees. As complete manual identification is virtually impossible, companies should therefore rely on PAM solutions that automatically recognise sensitive accounts and provide those responsible with a complete overview of all accounts and the number of all local admin users at all times. In a second step, the accounts should then be prioritised, making it easier to select the appropriate security controls. 2. Password management automation One of the most effective means of preventing the misuse of administrator accounts and accounts with privileged rights is adequate password protection. This makes it even more important to create, store and change passwords in a secure environment – and to do so regularly. As with account identification, companies should rely on PAM solutions that are based on automation, i.e. that automate password changes according to an individually defined schedule. All connected systems and users are then informed of the changes in real time so that – unlike with conventional password vaults, for example – no manual intervention is required. 3. Least privilege: implementing a minimal assignment of rights Access rights that are too broad represent a major risk for corporate security – especially when privileged authorisations and accounts are involved. A clear definition of access rights and responsibilities is therefore essential if companies want to maintain a clear security line. It is advisable to categorise accounts into user, service, system and infrastructure accounts and to allocate corresponding access rights according to the principle of minimum rights allocation, also known as the least privilege approach. This means that it is precisely defined who is allowed to access an account and how this access is organised. For example, it must be decided whether an administrator may know a fixed password or whether they must generate a new one before each session. Of course, this allocation must be checked and updated regularly. 4. Monitor privileged sessions In addition, IT departments should utilise security technologies that provide them with complete transparency of all administrative activities and sessions, making it easier for them to identify unusual and potentially harmful access at an early stage (and before major damage occurs). This is most effectively achieved with solutions that use machine learning technologies and analyse user activities based on individual behaviour patterns and automatically report suspicious access to privileged accounts. 5. Incident response plan in the event of an emergency In addition, companies should have prepared an incident response plan, which defines specific measures for defence and rapid containment of a cyberattack and ensures that companies do not lose any time in the event of an emergency. If, for example, privileged accounts have been compromised, an incident response plan is particularly important, as traditional protective measures – such as changing passwords or deactivating accounts – are not sufficient in this case and more comprehensive recovery measures must be implemented. By combining these measures, organizations can significantly enhance the security of privileged accounts and reduce the risk of unauthorized access or misuse of elevated privileges. It’s important to tailor these measures to the specific needs and risk profile of the organization.

Scroll to Top