security monitoring - PATECCO GmbH

What is the difference between traditional IT service provider and Managed Service Provider

In today’s rapidly evolving digital business environment, organizations face the constant challenge of managing and optimizing their IT infrastructure. The choice between traditional IT service providers and managed service providers (MSPs) has become a crucial decision for businesses striving for efficiency, scalability, and competitive advantage. This article delves into the fundamental distinctions between these two approaches, exploring how traditional IT service providers, with their reactive and project-based models, contrast with the proactive, comprehensive, and often subscription-based services offered by MSPs. By understanding these differences, businesses can make more informed decisions about their IT strategies, ensuring they select the right partner to meet their unique needs and goals. What are Managed Services? Managed IT services refer to the comprehensive and proactive management of an organization’s IT infrastructure and end-user systems by a third-party provider, known as a Managed Service Provider (MSP). These services encompass a wide range of IT functions, including network monitoring, cybersecurity, data backup and recovery, software updates, and help desk support. Unlike traditional IT support, which often operates on a break-fix model responding to issues as they arise, managed IT services are designed to prevent problems before they occur through continuous monitoring and maintenance. MSPs typically offer these services on a subscription basis, providing businesses with predictable costs and the expertise of specialized IT professionals. This arrangement allows organizations to focus on their core operations while ensuring their IT systems are secure, efficient, and up-to-date. What are traditional IT Services? Traditional IT services typically operate on a reactive, break-fix model, where support is provided as issues arise. These services are often project-based, focusing on specific tasks such as hardware and software installation, network setup, and periodic maintenance. Traditional IT providers are usually engaged for discrete projects or to address immediate technical problems, rather than offering continuous oversight. Their scope of work includes troubleshooting, repairing, and upgrading IT systems, as well as providing occasional consultancy for technology planning and implementation. This approach can lead to unpredictable costs, as businesses pay for services only when problems occur or when new projects are initiated. Unlike managed services, traditional IT services do not usually involve ongoing monitoring or proactive management, which can result in longer downtimes and increased vulnerability to security threats. What are the benefits of traditional IT Services and Managed Services? When comparing the benefits of traditional IT services and Managed Services, it’s evident that each approach offers distinct advantages tailored to different business needs. Traditional IT services provide cost control through a pay-as-you-go model, allowing businesses to pay only for services when required, and offering direct control over IT infrastructure with the flexibility to engage experts for specific projects. This model is ideal for businesses that need occasional, specialized IT support without long-term commitments. On the other hand, managed services deliver a comprehensive, proactive approach with continuous monitoring and maintenance, ensuring issues are prevented before they arise. This results in predictable costs through fixed subscription fees and enhanced security measures. Managed Service Providers (MSPs) offer access to specialized expertise and allow businesses to focus on their core operations by outsourcing IT management. They also provide scalability and comprehensive support, improving compliance and facilitating strategic IT planning. Overall, while traditional IT services are beneficial for short-term, project-specific needs, managed services offer a holistic, long-term solution for ongoing IT management and optimization. Traditional IT Service Provider vs. Managed Service Provider: There are clear differences between a managed service provider and a traditional IT service provider. However, it should be noted that the terms are not strictly delineated and there may be overlaps in the services offered. A managed service provider usually offers comprehensive, proactive services to manage a company’s entire IT infrastructure. In particular, this includes monitoring, maintenance, security and support. These are therefore normally recurring services, such as user management, regular backup tasks and/or long-term archiving. IT service providers, on the other hand, are usually consulted in the event of a one-off problem. This could be a server failure or a case of data loss, for example. An MSP usually acts proactively and uses preventative measures to avoid problems in advance. This can include, for example, the regular monitoring of systems and the implementation of security patches. This preventative mindset is advantageous for both the company and the managed service provider itself, as they look after the IT systems themselves: After all, they look after the IT systems themselves and therefore have an interest in avoiding problems and the associated additional work. An IT service provider can of course also adopt this mentality, but does not necessarily do so. Instead, their actions are reactive: they are commissioned when a problem already exists. It is not their job to avoid problems, but to solve them. While traditional IT service providers usually work on your premises, managed service providers mainly provide their services remotely. Most MSPs use cloud technologies for this. If you commission a managed service provider, for example, you do not have to accommodate additional staff on your premises and provide work resources. Traditional IT services typically involve variable, project-based costs, with charges incurred for each service request or task. MSPs, however, usually charge a fixed monthly or annual subscription fee, offering predictable and comprehensive service coverage. With traditional IT services, businesses maintain more direct control over their IT infrastructure, engaging service providers as needed. MSPs assume significant responsibility for managing and maintaining IT systems, which can reduce direct control for the business but also alleviates the burden of IT management. Traditional IT service providers are usually involved in IT strategy and planning on a project-by-project basis. In contrast, MSPs are actively involved in long-term IT strategy and planning, ensuring that the technology infrastructure aligns with business goals and can scale with growth. This proactive approach not only mitigates potential risks and downtimes but also optimizes IT performance, enabling businesses to focus on their core activities while leveraging advanced technology solutions managed by experts. Conclusion The distinction between traditional IT service providers and Managed Service Providers (MSPs) underscores a

Five Еffective Approaches for Security in Multi-Cloud Environments

Uncategorized / Von Ina Nikolova

Multi-cloud can bring great benefits to a company. For example, more and more companies are utilising the high degree of flexibility to develop and host applications natively in the cloud. These applications consist of so-called micro-services – services that only take on individual or a few tasks, exist independently of each other and are loosely coupled. This modular software architecture enables companies to implement changes to cloud-native applications quickly and easily. To get the best out of their multi-cloud environment without playing into the hands of criminals, organisations need a security approach that enables a consistently high level of security and seamless compliance management across all clouds. What is Multi-Cloud security? To understand multi-cloud security, you need to know the difference between multi-cloud and hybrid cloud services. The term „multi-cloud“ is used when cloud services from multiple cloud service providers are used. With this concept, your company can oversee separate projects in the different cloud environments of multiple cloud service providers. Like „multi-cloud“, „hybrid cloud“ also includes several cloud environments. However, in a hybrid cloud environment, work is distributed across a common workload system consisting of public cloud, local resources and a private cloud. A common advantage of hybrid cloud and multi-cloud is their adaptability and cost efficiency. Both support the highly flexible management of resources and data migrations that take place between local resources and the cloud. In addition, companies benefit from more control and security when operating a private cloud in a hybrid cloud environment. More and more industries are switching to multi-cloud and hybrid cloud infrastructures, exposing them to the typical risks of an unprotected cloud environment. These include an increased risk of data loss, unauthorised access, lack of transparency in multi-cloud environments and increased non-compliance with regulations. A single cyberattack can have negative consequences for the company and lead to a lack of customer confidence and loss of revenue and reputation. In this article PATECCO will share five useful tips that will sharpen your focus on the security aspects of multi-cloud environments. 1. Build up expertise for multi-cloud As a first step, companies need to build up the necessary expertise for multi-cloud environments. This involves topics such as containers, container orchestration, runtime environments or cloud-native development and provision. In many cases, this requires investment in employee training and development. 2. Establish visibility of your cloud workload It’s almost a mantra, but nevertheless the basis of any security strategy: I can only protect assets that I know. In the context of cloud and multi-cloud environments, this applies in particular to applications and the corresponding information stores. The first step is therefore always to determine what type of information and applications are used in the cloud and by whom. In many complex organisations, however, this is one of the first hurdles because the use of different cloud services has often developed historically. 3. Focus on centralised services and tools for scanning and monitoring In particular, tools, that can not only be used in different cloud environments, but can also transmit their results to a central console, are ideal for keeping the dashboards and processes required for monitoring up to date. As a rule, this allows all cloud systems used by a company to be monitored. In recent years, a new category of cloud monitoring tools has been developed, which is summarised under the term Cloud Workload Protection Platforms (CWPPs). A CWPP protects the workloads housed in the cloud from attacks by using techniques from the areas of network segmentation, system integrity protection and application control, behaviour monitoring, host-based intrusion prevention and, optionally, anti-malware solutions. In many cases, manufacturers also offer functions for zero trust, micro-segmentation and endpoint detection and response in this area. By focusing on logging and centralised services and tools for scanning and monitoring a multi-cloud environment, security teams can develop a coherent and sustainable strategy for their protection. This means that any problems and security incidents that arise can be recognised and rectified more quickly. In addition, integration into an overarching IT security strategy will sooner or later also make it easier to manage cloud solutions. 4. Recognise vulnerabilities It is a common misconception that moving to the cloud also means getting rid of vulnerabilities, or that these are now primarily a problem for the cloud provider. This is only partially true. Although reputable CSPs (cloud service providers) usually protect the vulnerabilities in their own infrastructure very reliably, the number of data breaches at third-party providers, such as cloud service providers, is rising sharply. The reason for the increased number of attacks on cloud service providers is generally not their lax security precautions (although this does happen). Rather, the cause is often due to incorrect or careless security settings by cloud users. One example of how this can occur is the temporary use of services, as often happens for marketing campaigns in which customer data, among other things, is used. If the services are not carefully cleaned up after use, such orphaned databases can quickly become a ticking time bomb that can cost a company dearly later on. 5. Trust is good, control is better All preventive measures, such as access restrictions, authentication procedures and data flow controls, however sophisticated they may be, can be circumvented or cancelled out sooner or later given enough time and the right methods. Security monitoring, which continuously observes the security-relevant processes and alerts the IT security managers in the event of deviations, helps to prevent this. This is easy to do within your own four walls because all the necessary information such as network, system and application logs is directly accessible. However, this traditional approach fails when this information is stored in the environment of one or more cloud providers. It is therefore important to ensure that the CSP has the appropriate functions for security monitoring when selecting the appropriate CSP. How PATECCO can support the planning and implementation of your cloud strategy? PATECCO’s cloud security services help our customers plan their native or hybrid cloud strategy. The