access control - PATECCO GmbH

Success Story: How Uniper SE Strengthened Its Cybersecurity with PATECCO’s Managed Services

As a major international energy provider, Uniper SE faced high security and compliance demands across its widespread infrastructure. When the company sought to secure privileged access to its systems – spanning headquarters in Düsseldorf and power plants throughout Europe – it turned to PATECCO. The goal was to implement a robust Privileged Access Management (PAM) solution and ensure its long-term operation through a tailored managed service. What began as a security necessity rapidly transformed into a strategic partnership that modernized Uniper’s access control and compliance landscape. Uniper SE is a leading international energy company headquartered in Düsseldorf, Germany. With a vast network of power plants and energy trading operations across Europe, the company plays a critical role in ensuring energy supply security across the region. Its business spans the generation and storage of electricity and natural gas, as well as the trading of commodities such as power, emission certificates, LNG, and coal. Given the scope and sensitivity of its operations, Uniper places a high priority on cybersecurity, particularly around the management of privileged accounts. To meet the growing need for secure access to critical systems, Uniper sought to implement a robust Privileged Access Management (PAM) solution. The challenge was to deploy this system rapidly across both its corporate headquarters and remote power plant locations – all while meeting strict regulatory requirements. In addition to the implementation, Uniper also required long-term operational support. This included continuous system monitoring, on-call availability for specific access requests, and seamless integration into existing service management platforms. The company needed a reliable partner who could not only deliver a technical solution but also manage and improve it over time. Uniper chose PATECCO as its trusted partner based on its extensive experience in implementing and managing IAM and PAM solutions, particularly in highly regulated industries. PATECCO stood out due to its ability to combine deep technical expertise with reliable managed services and a tailored approach to client needs. What made PATECCO particularly attractive was its proven capability to integrate PAM with existing systems and processes. A crucial element for Uniper was the integration of PAM into its ServiceNow environment – something PATECCO was able to custom-develop and adapt specifically for Uniper’s workflows. PATECCO implemented a comprehensive PAM system within a remarkably short time frame, deploying it at Uniper’s headquarters in Düsseldorf and across its various power plant locations. In parallel, PATECCO established a Managed Service Contract to ensure the continued operation and optimization of the solution. This managed service included 24/7 monitoring of privileged access activities, the ability to respond quickly to access-related incidents through an on-call support model, and the continuous fine-tuning of PAM configurations as Uniper’s needs evolved. PATECCO’s services also encompassed governance mechanisms such as monthly management reporting and review meetings to ensure transparency and alignment with business goals. Another critical component of the solution was full compliance with ISO 27001 standards. All operations were aligned with information security best practices, providing Uniper with audit-readiness and reduced compliance risk. By partnering with PATECCO, Uniper successfully deployed a secure and centralized PAM solution that significantly reduced the risk of unauthorized access and helped safeguard its most critical assets. The managed service model alleviated internal workloads by outsourcing the day-to-day operations and monitoring of the PAM system. Uniper also benefited from enhanced process transparency and governance, thanks to structured monthly reporting and constant communication between both teams. The tailored integration with ServiceNow ensured seamless access management workflows, further boosting operational efficiency. PATECCO’s end-to-end service delivery, commitment to compliance, and close customer alignment made it possible for Uniper to turn a security necessity into a business enabler.This collaboration marked Uniper’s first Managed Service project for Privileged Access Management – a milestone that demonstrated the value of choosing the right strategic partner. Curious how your organization can achieve the same level of security and efficiency? Book your free consultation with one of our experts today!

PATECCO Quick Tip: 6 simple steps to enhance your organization’s IAM security

Uncategorized / Von Ina Nikolova

Nowadays, in the dynamic digital world we live in, security is no longer just an IT concern -it’s a critical component of your entire business strategy. As organizations undergo rapid digital transformation, integrating more applications, automating processes, and fostering innovation, they also face expanded exposure to security threats. The integration of IT with operational technology, along with partnerships across the value chain, increases both the value and risk associated with these transformations. To mitigate these risks, a strong Identity and Access Management framework is essential. At PATECCO, we understand that IAM is the cornerstone of your cybersecurity strategy, protecting sensitive data and controlling access across your systems. While IAM solutions may seem complex, there are simple yet powerful steps you can take today to strengthen your security posture and safeguard your organization from emerging threats. Multi-Factor Authentication adds an essential layer of defense by requiring more than just a password to authenticate users. By incorporating MFA, even if an attacker manages to steal a password, they won’t be able to access systems without the additional authentication factor. This could be anything from a one-time code sent to a mobile device to biometric verification. It’s a proven method to reduce the risk of unauthorized access and enhance overall system integrity. The Principle of Least Privilege ensures that employees or users are only granted the minimum access they need to perform their jobs. By limiting permissions, you mitigate the risk of internal threats and reduce the attack surface in case a user’s credentials are compromised. This practice also helps streamline access control, improving overall efficiency while maintaining a heightened level of security. Over time, organizations accumulate dormant user accounts, often due to employees leaving or project-based contractors finishing their work. Unused accounts are a serious security risk, as they can provide unauthorized access to your systems. It’s critical to regularly review and audit user accounts, revoking access immediately for any users who no longer require it. Implementing automated tools to deactivate unused accounts can help simplify this process and ensure you’re not leaving any vulnerabilities exposed. A centralized identity management system allows you to oversee and control all user identities across your organization from a single point. This system streamlines user provisioning and de-provisioning processes, ensuring that access is granted, updated, or revoked in real-time as users join, move, or leave the organization. A unified identity management approach helps maintain consistency across platforms and ensures access controls are applied uniformly throughout the organization. Regular monitoring and auditing of access logs are critical for identifying any suspicious or unauthorized activities. By setting up automated alerts and auditing mechanisms, you can stay ahead of potential security threats. This not only helps detect anomalies in real-time but also aids in compliance with regulatory standards that require tracking access to sensitive information. Proactively monitoring access patterns allows you to address security issues before they escalate. As organizations grow, managing individual user permissions becomes complex and error-prone. Role-Based Access Control (RBAC) simplifies this by assigning permissions based on a user’s role within the organization. Instead of managing access on a per-user basis, you define roles (e.g., HR Manager, IT Admin, Sales Rep) with specific access rights, and assign users to those roles. This not only streamlines the onboarding and offboarding process but also ensures consistency and compliance. RBAC minimizes the risk of privilege creep – when users accumulate access they no longer need – and provides a scalable, structured way to enforce the Principle of Least Privilege across the enterprise. Why IAM is crucial for your business’s security and efficiency in the digital age? In an era defined by rapid technological evolution and constant connectivity, the importance of cybersecurity – especially through Identity and Access Management – cannot be overstated. IAM is not just a technical necessity, it’s a strategic enabler that protects your digital assets while supporting agility and growth. By implementing practical measures such as MFA, the Principle of Least Privilege, regular account reviews, centralized identity management, and continuous access monitoring, organizations can build a resilient defense against ever-evolving threats. At PATECCO, we believe that proactive, well-structured IAM isn’t just about reducing risk – it’s about empowering your business to operate confidently and securely in the digital era. The steps you take today can define how safely and successfully you navigate tomorrow. Ready to strengthen your organization’s security? One of our experts at PATECCO will guide you through a tailored IAM strategy – at no cost to you!

Top 3 IAM Challenges & How PATECCO Solves Them

Uncategorized / Von Ina Nikolova

Identity and Access Management can pose significant challenges for organizations across all industries. In our latest video, we break down the top three issues faced by many and showcase how PATECCO provides effective solutions to enhance security and streamline processes. IAM Challenge #1 – Weak Access Control Many businesses lack strict access policies, leading to: IAM Challenge #2 – Compliance Issues Regulatory frameworks like GDPR, ISO 27001, NIS-2, and HIPAA demand strict identity and access controls. Without clear audit trails and access policies, businesses risk: IAM Challenge #3 – Inefficient User Provisioning Without IAM automation, businesses face:

Integrating IAM, PAM, and Zero Trust – PATECCO’s Strategy for Holistic Cybersecurity Protection

Uncategorized / Von Ina Nikolova

As technology continues to advance, businesses are constantly confronted with escalating cybersecurity challenges. With an increase in cyber threats, data breaches, and complex IT environments, companies need robust solutions to protect sensitive information and maintain compliance. PATECCO offers a unique approach to cybersecurity by seamlessly integrating Identity and Access Management (IAM), Privileged Access Management (PAM), and Zero Trust principles into one cohesive strategy. This article highlights how PATECCO’s comprehensive cybersecurity framework can help businesses safeguard their digital assets and enhance their security posture. IAM, PAM and Zero Trust as crucial tools for modern cybersecurity Before diving into how these components work together, it’s important to understand what IAM, PAM, and Zero Trust are, and why they are crucial for modern enterprises. IAM manages digital identities and controls access to resources, ensuring that only authorized users can access sensitive data. PAM focuses on securing access to critical systems by privileged users, preventing exploitation of elevated privileges. Zero Trust, a security framework, operates on the principle that no user or device should be trusted by default, with every access request being authenticated and authorized based on identity, device, and context, reducing the attack surface. Why Integrating IAM, PAM, and Zero Trust Matters The integration of IAM, PAM, and Zero Trust is essential for achieving a robust cybersecurity strategy. When combined, these three components create a powerful security ecosystem that is proactive, adaptive, and resilient to evolving threats. By incorporating Zero Trust, PATECCO helps eliminate traditional trust boundaries within corporate networks. The combination of IAM and PAM ensures that all access to applications, data, and systems is continually verified and only provided to the right people under the right conditions. IAM and PAM work hand-in-hand to enforce the principle of least privilege. By providing users with access based on their roles and responsibilities, and by managing privileged accounts, organizations can limit access to critical resources and reduce the risk of insider threats. Zero Trust models with IAM and PAM provide a holistic approach to risk management. Access to sensitive systems and data is continuously validated and logged, which allows organizations to detect and respond to threats more efficiently. By integrating these technologies, PATECCO enables businesses to monitor every access attempt, reducing the likelihood of breaches. In addition to strengthening security, the integration of IAM, PAM, and Zero Trust helps businesses stay compliant with industry regulations such as GDPR, HIPAA, and PCI-DSS. PATECCO’s approach ensures that security controls are applied consistently across the organization and that every user access event is properly authenticated and logged. This capability not only reduces the risk of non-compliance but also helps businesses maintain an auditable trail of access activities. Such records are essential for internal audits and regulatory reporting, making it easier for businesses to meet stringent compliance requirements while also strengthening their security posture. Benefits of IAM, PAM, and Zero Trust Integration Integrating IAM, PAM, and Zero Trust offers numerous benefits for organizations seeking to enhance their cybersecurity posture. The combination of these technologies creates a robust, layered security framework that ensures businesses are well-equipped to prevent, detect, and respond to cyber threats. By adopting the integrated cybersecurity solutions, businesses can expect several benefits, including: The integration of IAM, PAM, and Zero Trust ensures that any unauthorized access or suspicious behavior is promptly detected, enabling quick response and mitigation of threats. By enforcing strict access controls and monitoring privileged accounts, the risk of insider threats is minimized, helping to protect sensitive company data. Automated compliance features and detailed reporting make it easier for organizations to adhere to industry regulations and maintain audit trails. A unified approach to cybersecurity streamlines processes, reduces complexity, and improves the overall security posture of the organization. PATECCO’s strategy to integrate Identity and Access Management, Privileged Access Management, and Zero Trust principles represents a holistic approach to cybersecurity that addresses the dynamic threat environment faced by organizations today. By harmonizing these critical components, PATECCO not only enhances the security framework but also fosters a culture of continuous vigilance and adaptability in the face of emerging cyber threats. This multifaceted approach serves as a blueprint for organizations aiming to strengthen their cybersecurity postures while facilitating innovation and growth in an increasingly interconnected environment.

Strengthening Identity and Access Management in Insurance Companies: Navigating VAIT Compliance

Uncategorized / Von Ina Nikolova

In an era where digital transformation is reshaping the insurance industry, the significance of robust Identity and Access Management (IAM) systems cannot be overstated. Insurance companies are increasingly reliant on vast amounts of sensitive data, necessitating stringent security measures to protect against cyber threats and unauthorized access. The introduction of the German Federal Financial Supervisory Authority’s (BaFin) Requirements for IT in Insurance Undertakings (VAIT) has added a layer of regulatory compliance that insurance companies must navigate diligently. VAIT provides a comprehensive framework aimed at ensuring the integrity, availability, and confidentiality of IT systems and data within the insurance sector. It underscores the critical need for insurance companies to implement effective IAM strategies to manage and control access to their information systems. This article delves into the six central components of authorization management for insurance companies in the context of VAIT, exploring how these elements contribute to a robust security posture and regulatory adherence. These components include access control policies, role-based access control, recertification, SoD, IAM Tools and PAM. Understanding and implementing these solutions effectively is vital for insurance companies to protect their digital assets and ensure they meet VAIT’s stringent requirements. Essential Components of Authorization Management for Insurance Companies The implementation of the special requirements for insurance companies in the context of VAIT demands a targeted identification of the relevant components of authorisation management. Central compliance principles – such as the minimum authority principle – must always be taken into account when designing successful authorisation management. The components described below are crucial for full compliance with VAIT. 1. Access Control Policies Access control policies are the foundation of authorization management. These policies define who has access to what resources within an organization, based on their role and responsibilities. Key aspects include: To be VAIT compliant, insurance companies must establish and enforce these policies to prevent unauthorized access to sensitive information. 2. Role-Based Access Control (RBAC) Role-Based Access Control (RBAC) is another fundamental component of authorization management for insurance companies, essential for compliance with VAIT. RBAC streamlines the assignment of access rights by categorizing employees into roles based on their job functions and responsibilities, ensuring that each role has predefined access permissions. This approach simplifies access management, enhances security, and ensures that employees only have access to the information necessary for their roles. By implementing RBAC, insurance companies can effectively enforce the principle of least privilege, reduce the risk of unauthorized access, and maintain a clear audit trail of access permissions, all of which are critical for VAIT compliance. 3. Recertification Recertification involves the periodic review and validation of users‘ access rights to ensure they remain appropriate and necessary. This process is essential for maintaining compliance, enhancing security, and minimizing the risk of unauthorized access to sensitive data. 4. Segregation of Duties (SoD) Segregation of Duties (SoD) is a core component of authorization management for insurance companies, especially under VAIT. SoD involves dividing tasks and access privileges among multiple individuals to prevent any single person from having control over all aspects of a critical process, thereby reducing the risk of fraud and errors. This practice ensures that no single employee can execute and authorize transactions independently, which enhances internal controls and mitigates the potential for conflicts of interest. Implementing SoD effectively helps insurance companies comply with VAIT by ensuring robust access controls and accountability, thereby safeguarding sensitive data and maintaining operational integrity. 5. Identity and Access Management Tools Identity and Access Management (IAM) tools facilitate the automation and enforcement of access control policies, streamline the processes of user provisioning and de-provisioning, and support robust authentication mechanisms like multi-factor authentication (MFA). By integrating IAM tools, insurance companies can efficiently manage and monitor access rights, ensure compliance with regulatory mandates, and enhance overall security. IAM tools also provide detailed audit logs and reporting capabilities, enabling continuous oversight and regular audits required by VAIT, thereby safeguarding sensitive data and maintaining operational integrity. 6. Privileged Access Management Privileged Access Management (PAM) ensures the security and oversight of highly sensitive accounts with elevated access privileges. PAM solutions control, monitor, and audit the activities of privileged users, who have access to critical systems and data, thereby mitigating the risk of insider threats and unauthorized access. Implementing PAM helps insurance companies enforce the principle of least privilege, providing granular access controls and ensuring that privileged access is granted only when necessary and appropriately monitored. By leveraging PAM, insurance companies can enhance their security posture, comply with stringent regulatory requirements, and protect their most sensitive information and systems. Challenges and Best Practices Implementing an effective IAM strategy in compliance with VAIT poses several challenges, including the complexity of integrating IAM solutions with existing systems, managing the lifecycle of identities, and ensuring continuous monitoring and adaptation to evolving threats. However, adopting best practices such as leveraging advanced technologies (AI for behavioral analytics), automating IAM processes, and engaging in continuous improvement can help insurance companies overcome these challenges. In conclusion, meeting the special regulatory requirements for IAM under VAIT is essential for insurance companies to protect their IT infrastructure and data assets. By implementing robust IAM policies and systems, insurance companies can not only achieve regulatory compliance, but also enhance their overall cybersecurity posture, safeguarding their operations and customer trust in an increasingly digital world.

Role-Based Access Control as a Cybersecurity Imperative for the Business

Uncategorized / Von Ina Nikolova

Defining and granting access rights is a constant challenge for IT departments. Managing access rights based on a role-based approach makes controlling system authorisations for users in complex IT environments clear and simple. On one hand, as many regular users – whether employees, external contractors or others – require the same or similar access rights to perform their work, the assignment of access rights can be greatly simplified by grouping employees based on their tasks and associated competences within the organisation. On the other hand, a lack of access control or automatic provisioning of rights and access can be costly and risky for the enterprise in a number of ways. It means that new employees and contractors may not be up and running as quickly as necessary, they may gain access to systems they shouldn’t have access to, they may retain their access rights when they change roles or leave the organisation, and they may inadvertently compromise the organisation’s security profile. The power of RBAC Role-based access control is a procedure for managing and controlling access to files or services. Instead of giving users in the network direct access rights to various systems or making spontaneous decisions about who can access what and for how long, access is granted according to a role previously assigned to the user. When used systematically, RBAC reduces the risk of a user being granted too much access and thus promotes the implementation of a least privilege strategy. With clearly defined roles, protocols are created that specify exactly which role is suitable for which type of user, which prevents inappropriate inheritance of authorisations. In the event of a compromise, authorisations can also be blocked extremely quickly and on a large scale, effectively preventing the spread of cyberattacks. This is the reason why the RBAC concept is often used, particularly in companies with more than 500 employees. This ensures that employees always have the rights they need and that there are no interruptions to operations. RBAC allows organizations to define roles and permissions based on their specific business requirements and security policies. Roles can be tailored to reflect different job functions, departments, or projects, and permissions can be fine-tuned to accommodate variations in access needs across different user groups. With RBAC, companies can react more flexibly to employee changes according to the Joiner, Mover Leaver (JML) process. Especially when employees join, change departments or leave the company, RBAC makes work much easier and safer. At the same time rights can be granted and withdrawn at any time via role memberships, which makes RBAC very adaptable and dynamic. Role-Based Access Control also makes the time-consuming assignment of individual authorisations obsolete by predefined authorisations to roles once and can be rolled out to several people in one go or withdrawn again. If the roles are named in a way that is easy to understand, this also increases Transparency and traceability on the user side. The allocation of individual authorisations without RBAC is not only time-consuming. It also means less control and overview of who has access to what. It also leaves room for errors and over-authorisation. Thus, security gaps can arise if the individual authorisations are no longer withdrawn or are retained for longer than necessary. If users are given too many authorisations, this can lead to errors. With a well thought-out and predefined authorisation concept, the company not only saves work but is also on the safe side: access rights are defined exclusively via the role concept. Over-authorisation of individual employees is thus avoided in accordance with the Principle of Least Privilege (PoLP) in order to fulfil compliance requirements. In this way, RBAC helps to significantly increase efficiency and security in IT and throughout the entire company. Changes are made automatically, rights no longer have to be applied for and assigned individually and the waiting time for approval is also eliminated. This not only makes managing access rights easier, but more error-resistant, as well. Role-based access control includes role authorisations and user roles and can be used to meet a variety of company requirements, from security and compliance to efficiency and cost control. With role-based access control, organisations reduce both the complexity of assigning access rights and the associated costs. It provides the ability to review access rights to ensure compliance with various regulations and streamline processes so that new employees are up and running from day one by pre-defining which systems the new employee should have access to based on their role in the organisation. RBAC facilitates auditing and reporting by providing a structured framework for access control. Audit logs can track user activities and access attempts based on role assignments and permissions, enabling organizations to monitor compliance with regulatory requirements and internal policies. RBAC helps demonstrate accountability and transparency by documenting who has access to sensitive resources and how access is being used, which is essential for compliance audits and investigations. RBAC supports segregation of duties by defining roles with mutually exclusive sets of permissions. This prevents conflicts of interest and reduces the risk of fraud and errors by ensuring that no single user has excessive privileges that could be abused. SoD controls help prevent unauthorized activities such as unauthorized transactions, data tampering, and fraud, thereby enhancing security. Having in mind the above listed advantages, we can conclude that RBAC is important for businesses in terms of enhanced security, facilitated compliance with regulatory requirements, mitigated risks, and improved operational efficiency. By implementing RBAC, businesses can strengthen their security posture, protect sensitive information, and maintain trust with customers, partners, and regulatory authorities.

Cybersecurity in Banking sector: Importance, Risks and Regulations

Uncategorized / Von Ina Nikolova

The threat of financial fraud, cyber-attacks and other malicious activities has become a major concern for businesses around the world, especially in the banking sector. As risk management is essential to protect assets and maintain customer trust, it is important to keep an eye on the latest trends in cyber security in banking and best practices specific to banking. With constant changes in technology, regulations and security requirements adding to the overall complexity, it can be difficult to operate systems securely while meeting business objectives. To help banks better protect their networks against evolving threats – both internally and externally initiated – this article takes a closer look at current cybersecurity risks banks face today and strategic solutions institutions can use to defend themselves against attacks. Importance of cyber security for banking Due to rapid technological developments, maintaining a secure system is becoming increasingly important for banks. In today’s digital world, there is an even greater risk of sensitive personal information such as bank details and passwords being hacked or accessed by malicious actors. The security of customer data is critical to the survival and reputation of a bank. To achieve this goal, banks need to be constantly vigilant and implement enhanced security measures that protect against security threats when browsing the internet or engaging in online banking activities. Banks should also ensure that they use the latest software updates and that all employees are trained in the secure handling of customer data and banking transactions. Ultimately, protecting customer data through strong cybersecurity is essential to ensure safety and security in the banking sector and the longevity of business operations. The biggest risks for banks‘ cyber security In recent years, cybercrime has increased so much that it is already objectively considered the biggest threat to the financial sector. As hackers‘ methods and know-how have become more sophisticated, it is becoming increasingly difficult to consistently defend against attacks. Below you are listed the most important cyber security threats in the banking sector. Phishing attacks In this case, hackers create clone websites that any user can easily access via third-party messaging services. Since there is a credible multi-factor authentication there and it generally looks like a real website, users do not even realize that they have already given their credentials to hackers. Distributed Denial of Service (DDoS) A DDoS attack uses a botnet – a collection of connected online devices – to flood a target website with spoofed traffic. Unlike other cyberattacks, a DDoS attack does not attempt to compromise security. Instead, the goal is to exhaust network, server or application resources so that they become unavailable to the targeted audience. A DDoS attack can also be used to mask other malicious activity and disable security devices to compromise the target’s security. It is also interesting to note that during the pandemic, the number of DDoS attacks increased by 30% in the financial services industry. Unencrypted data As cybercriminals have become more creative, data threats have not diminished over time. It’s no longer enough to just protect data access points – the data itself must be encrypted. Our partner, IBM , reports that the average cost of a data breach is $4.35 million. The price tag is sure to rise in the future as cyberattacks occur daily, causing tremendous damage to businesses and users. However, with robust encryption methods, these costs can be reduced or avoided altogether. The Ransomware Ransomware is used by cybercriminals to encrypt important data and deny its owners access to it unless they pay a ransom. This cyberattack is unfortunately a serious threat to banks, 90% of which have already been hit. In the age of cryptocurrencies, fraudsters are particularly interested in finding vulnerabilities in the decentralized system. If these vulnerabilities are present, they can easily steal money from the trading system. Data manipulation Altering digital documents and information is known as data tampering. Cybercriminals use arbitrary attack vectors to penetrate networks, gain access to software or applications, and alter data. By manipulating data rather than stealing it, hackers can be more successful and cause catastrophic consequences for organizations or individuals. It is a sophisticated cyberattack because it can take a long time for a user to realize that their sensitive and confidential data has been irrevocably altered. Spoofing Spoofing is a form of cyberattack in which criminals disguise their identity as a trusted and known source in order to steal confidential information or money. Banks face a constant threat of spoofing attacks that can have serious consequences for their customers and operations. In addition, a man-in-the-middle attack is gaining traction, where a hacker intercepts communications between a customer and the bank to gain access to personal information, redirect payments or even launch a denial-of-service attack. Therefore, it is important that banks remain on guard and take measures to protect themselves from these threats. Cybersecurity regulations for banks impacting FinTech Financial institutions should consider the following FinTech regulations to maintain strong security and prevent data breaches. Security managers can use these regulations to evaluate their security measures and those of their suppliers. In addition, your organization can easily identify the processes and procedures needed to mitigate cybersecurity risks. Below are the three most common financial compliance requirements related to financial cybersecurity in banking. NIST NIST has become the No. 1 standard for cybersecurity assessment, security vulnerability identification and compliance with cybersecurity laws, even if compliance is not mandatory. NIST has developed 110 requirements covering various aspects of an organization’s IT procedures, policies and technology. These requirements address access control, system configuration, and authentication methods. In addition, cybersecurity and incident response protocols are defined. Meeting all of these requirements ensures that an organization’s network, systems, and people are efficiently prepared to securely manage all controlled unclassified information (CUI). GDPR The General Data Protection Regulation (EU GDPR) is a security framework designed to protect citizens‘ personal data. Any company that processes private data of EU citizens, whether manually or automatically, must comply with the GDPR. This regulation highlights a

What are Insider Threats and How Can Identity Governance and Administration Prevent Them?

Uncategorized / Von Ina Nikolova

Insider threats are a major and growing concern for organizations, as the human factor is often the most difficult to control and predict when it comes to data security and privacy. With digitization, the amount of digital data is growing exponentially, and with it comes an increase in the number of systems and human interactions with data. More interaction means that data is exposed to more security vulnerabilities. The potential risks from insider threats are numerous, including financial fraud, data corruption, theft of valuable information and malware installation. These incidents can lead to data breaches that expose sensitive information such as personally identifiable information (PII) or intellectual property (IP) and can result in large fines, while their detection is no easy task for security teams. What are insider threats in cybersecurity? Insider threats are cybersecurity risks that originate within the organization itself. They can be caused by users with legitimate access to the organization’s assets – including current or former employees, contractors, business partners, third-party vendors, etc. Insiders can vary significantly in awareness, motivation, intent, and level of access. Traditional security measures such as firewalls or antivirus systems focus on external threats and are not always able to detect threats originating from within the organization. In addition to being invisible to traditional security solutions, attacks from insiders can be more difficult to detect or prevent than attacks from the outside and can go unnoticed for months or years. Difference between internal and external threats In many ways, insider threats can do far more damage than external threats. This is because an insider threat potentially has direct access to sensitive data and critical applications, which it can exploit by moving laterally and vertically until it reaches its desired target. For example, it is easy for cybercriminals to hack an administrator’s account to gain access to the root server and database system. Most companies are also not adequately protected against attacks from the inside, making them much easier to carry out than attacks from the outside. And in many cases, the attacker can carry out his malicious activities undetected. For example, a hacker can trick a user into giving him his credentials, which then allows him to log in as a legitimate user and steal data without being noticed. He could also gain access to a trusted insider, and then lie in wait until he achieves his goal. Without IGA tools, administrators would never notice this because there are no guardrails to guarantee a minimum level of privilege. Finally, the measures that protect against external threats are largely useless against internal attacks, as they are simply bypassed. Therefore, specialized solutions are needed to effectively combat them. How IGA can help mitigate insider threats An IGA tool is a fundamental protection against insider threats. That’s because it addresses the core of what makes insider threats dangerous and effective – identity theft. GA provides a streamlined way to manage an organization’s identities, including user accounts and access rights. Ensure that employees, contractors and outsourced IT departments can only access network resources designated for them. In addition, access rights can be granted or revoked automatically, depending on the situation. For example, if the system suspects that an account has been compromised, it can revoke all privileges to prevent the account from further penetrating the network. This is also useful for tracking down and deleting orphaned accounts that are easy targets for insider attacks. IGA tools also have monitoring and analysis capabilities that constantly check user activity. If an irregularity is detected, the account in question can be immediately blocked as a preventative measure. In other words: IGA is like a watchful eye, keeping an eye on the network around the clock. A robust IGA solution combines user lifecycle management, role-based access control, and automated auditing to reduce the risk of unauthorized data breaches. It also enables organizations to scale and keep up with changing business needs thanks to the following capabilities: Insider threat indicator monitoring Robust monitoring and security analytics detect any suspicious activity that could indicate an insider threat. This allows malicious access to be quickly detected and patterns used to identify potential threats before they cause real damage. A comprehensive IGA solution also helps protect against data loss by alerting when files are accessed without authorization. Such a solution can even detect when privileged users gain unauthorized access to sensitive data and take it out of the organization. With this feature, potential internal threats can be quickly identified and action taken before damage is caused.